Skip to main content

Theresa May suggests Boris Johnson only wants power and insists his Brexit plan is doomed to failure in closing swipe as she prepares to leave Number 10

THERESA May has suggested Boris Johnson only wants power and insisted his plan to deliver Brexit is doomed as she prepares to leave Number Ten.

The prime minister used her last major interview before she steps down to take a thinly-veiled dig at her likely successor, though stopped short of calling him out by name.

Theresa May used her last interview as prime minister to take a thinly-veiled dig at her likely successor
AFP or licensors

Boris Johnson said today that he would it “hard to disagree” with the claim that the May’s handling of Brexit had been a “disaster”[/caption]

Asked about the causes she has worked on during her tenure, May replied: “Too many people in politics think being Prime Minister is a position of power.

“Actually, it is a position of service to the country where you are always asking yourself ‘What more can I do for the public?’.

“All too often those who see it as a position of power see it as about themselves and not about the people they are serving.

“There is a real difference.”

Former foreign secretary Boris Johnson is currently the front runner in a battle with Jeremy Hunt to replace May, who will leave Downing Street on July 24.

On Thursday, he took a swipe of his own at the prime minister, responding to a tweet by President Trump branding May a “disaster” by saying: “I find it hard to disagree.”

In a series of tweets this week, Trump said May and her team had made a “mess” of Brexit, and that “the good news for the wonderful United Kingdom is that they will soon have a new Prime Minister”.


May also spoke today about the prospect that Britain would be able to negotiate a Brexit deal different to her own.

“The EU have said they don’t want to and won’t reopen agreement,” she told the Daily Mail.

She went on to criticise those MPs who had “spent their lives campaigning for Brexit” but then voted down her deal, adding: “I did everything I could to get it over the line!

“I was willing to sit down with Jeremy Corbyn, willing to sacrifice my premiership – give up my job!”

Criticisms of her approach have included the suggestion that she would have gotten more out of Brussels if she had swung her handbag, like Margaret Thatcher.

Boris Johnson, who twice voted down May’s deal before backing it in her third and final attempt to get it through parliament, has said he intends to approach the problem with “more positive energy”.

May responded: “I can assure you I put positive energy into it!”

Britain’s second ever female prime minister took the opportunity to question how her emotional speech announcing her intention to stand down was received.

“If a male Prime Minister’s voice had broken up, it would have been said ‘What great patriotism, they really love their country’,” she said.

“But if a female Prime Minister does it, it is “Why is she crying?’.”

She was also keen to dispel the impression of her as being dull and work-obsessed, recalling the return flight from the recent G20 summit in Japan, on which she knocked back Aperol spritzers with her team.

“There was plenty of laughter. We were playing cards and jokes were going round,” she said.

Theresa May tried three times to get parliament to vote for her Brexit deal
AFP or licensors

We pay for your stories! Do you have a story for The Sun Online news team? Email us at or call 0207 782 4368 . You can WhatsApp us on 07810 791 502. We pay for videos too. Click here to upload yours.


  1. Her plan was doomed from the moment she tried to overrule Boris. Her/the Eu’s WA was a Surrender Treaty that locked the UK into vassalage - an over-used description, perhaps - but one that describes it precisely. She her opportunity on 29 March to leave on WTO terms and funked it: arguably unlawfully. She was probably the worst PM in UK history. Let’s give Boris a chance: at least he is a Leaver and has optimism.

  2. Bit rich coming from the Goonybird. Look at all the backs she stabbed to get her grubby hands on the keys to No10.

  3. What a thing to say she has no respect for anyone who wants out of her beloved EU .she looked like a big sack of potatoes in Westminster on questions


Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politicians are wrong about what the public want

So the, out of touch political elite are trying to say that the public would be happy to cough up an extra £2000 a year, per household to prop up the NHS? 
Advertisers website Wrong! While many British families struggle to make ends meet, the political elite thinks that people will be glad to fund a failing business that is being run into the ground because of their failed policies on how the NHS is managed?

No. This just shows that we have monkeys running our country! Many people on Facebook have shared the above post on various pages; a large number of those people don't even do politics. If our political elite were more than just yes men weighed down by the chains of political correctness, they would see that the people of Britain have had enough. 
Ever increasing taxation to try and fix their mistakes? 
Continuiosly using the NHS as a stick to beat the opposition or a classic party political paper dragon! (Paper Dragon): a politician or political party whocampaign to fox the proble…

PETITION - Keep Swinson OUT of the Lords

Keep Jo Swinson from being given a Peerage.
Sign the petition and share this everywhere

If Jo Swinson is given honors, it will be a scandal and ANOTHER Nail in the coffin for the House of Lords. Sign the petition


Has the Supreme Court handed Boris Johnson a Brexit escape route?

The Supreme Court’s judgment is the latest constitutional perversion after the Benn act. But ironically it may assist the Government in achieving its objective of Britain leaving the EU by 31 October, without having to seek an extension to the Article 50 process.
In paragraph 34, the Supreme Court states that its ‘proper function’ under our constitution is to give effect to the separation of powers (which justifies court intervention in relation to prorogation). Then, in what appears to be an innocuous sentence in paragraph 55, it says that it is to be “remember[ed] always that the actual task of governing is for the executive and not for Parliament or the courts.”
Yet the Benn Act manifestly contradicts this principle. It dictates how the Government must conduct negotiations with a foreign body, the EU, to the extent of obliging the Prime Minister to write specifically worded letters and accept whatever extension it offers when certain conditions are not met. In the situation when t…