Billionaire globalist and altogether controversial figure, George Soros, is now the subject of a $10 billion lawsuit accusing him of being a “racketeer billionaire” for meddling in the affairs of a sovereign African nation — purely for personal reasons — in what critics say typifies his modus operandi. See what others are saying about Soros and who he is in the comments section below. FOX News reports the 86-year-old financier and manager of a global network of nonprofits will be forced by BSG Resources’ lawsuit to answer for manipulating the politics and economics of Guinea for his own benefit Despite Soros’ often contentious dealings and reputation as a pompous busybody, the filing in New York Federal Court has thus far largely escaped the spotlight. Soros, who controls a web of international nonprofits in addition to his vast financial empire, used his sway with the government of Guinea to freeze Israeli company BSG Resources out of the West African nation’s lucrative iron ore mini
German MEP sparks furious row as he blames Lord Frost's 'mess' for Brexit talks delay
ReplyDeleteNovember 26, 2020
BREXIT negotiations would have concluded months ago had the British negotiators not made a "mess", German MEP Bernd Lange claimed.
Read the full Article German MEP sparks furious row as he blames Lord Frost's 'mess' for Brexit talks delay
the eurofill may well seek to blame The British negotiator For their singular failure to recognise the british were no longer prepared to Put up with the current exceptions of the Domonason of british free will with-the "EU". It been a litany of failure to allow the UK to not harvest the majority of fish out of their own waters.
That denial of their right have .
festerd & tern to a routing pustule within it Citizen class to Contently Holding us short ON the fish quotes. forbidden to catch fish in the own sea's , the Are entitled to.
For the avoidance of doubt ,
:- We joined a Common Market Not a "EU" political enterprise , there was never a referendum that allowed a british free expression in the choice of Maastricht. is was taken by executive Decree, By one individual that did, not have The right to do so.. Within the british commonwealth .
The individual was, { John Mager] A tory MP of judas character}
The PEP of german descent In theis pos forgets The government sevse it people Who are the League-Lords of the elected MP into Office To serve the nation state, For the term of that office & reten IT intacct a complete in its original condition, so that the next Eleted (MP) may mack amendments & carry out the will of its citizens & their LeagueLords.
IN CONCLUSION >
There can never be the surrender of power, Loss of sovereignty By the UK to a foreign power. there part without a referendum Not even an executive Decree can diliver such a release of authority , A 100 % referendum Can start the talks to one. OR such Thing as loss or a defeat in war. It's citizens may All parties must return to the stat that which is the Property of the state-Unchanged & in tackt , SO The next seven to serve THE sovereignty of it people may be elected. In Their Parliament .
THE POINT THIS EMP DOS NOT GET. IS { THEIR PARLIAMENT}