Skip to main content

UK’s Brexit chief Olly Robbins quits so next PM can choose new envoy to kickstart talks with EU

BRITAIN’S top Brexit negotiator will quit this summer rather than leading talks under the new PM.

Senior mandarin Olly Robbins is expected to take up a lucrative City job after leaving the civil service.

Olly Robbins will quit as the UK’s top negotiator this summer

His resignation will allow Boris Johnson or Jeremy Hunt to pick their own envoy to Brussels as they try to turbo-charge Brexit talks.

Cabinet Secretary Sir Mark Sedwill could also be on the way out within months.

Mr Robbins has been a controversial figure with Brexiteers blasting him as a “roadblock” to quitting the EU.

He was repeatedly accused of stopping efforts to drive a tougher bargain with Brussels.

But allies insist he was only carrying out instructions from Theresa May.

Mr Robbins is expected to leave his post shortly after the new Prime Minister taks office on July 24.
He is reported to have already lined up a high-paid job with a bank.

The Whitehall veteran worked in the Treasury, No10 and Home Office before taking over as chief Brexit negotiator in 2016.

Stewart Jackson, an ex-Tory MP who worked in the Brexit Department, said: “Like Theresa May, Olly Robbins was now a roadblock to resolving Brexit.”

Mr Johnson or Mr Hunt is likely to pick a new negotiator who is seen as more pro-Brexit.

As well as Mr Robbins, Sir Mark Sedwill – head of the whole civil service – is said to be lining up a move when the new PM takes over.

He reportedly wants to become Britain’s new ambassador to the US.

This year Sir Mark accused Gavin Williamson – now one of BoJo’s closest allies – of leaking state secrets from the National Security Council.

Sir Mark Sedwill could also stand down
PA:Press Association

We pay for your stories! Do you have a story for The Sun Online politics team? Email us at or call 0207 782 4368. We pay for videos too. Click here to upload yours


Popular posts from this blog

Politicians are wrong about what the public want

So the, out of touch political elite are trying to say that the public would be happy to cough up an extra £2000 a year, per household to prop up the NHS? 
Advertisers website Wrong! While many British families struggle to make ends meet, the political elite thinks that people will be glad to fund a failing business that is being run into the ground because of their failed policies on how the NHS is managed?

No. This just shows that we have monkeys running our country! Many people on Facebook have shared the above post on various pages; a large number of those people don't even do politics. If our political elite were more than just yes men weighed down by the chains of political correctness, they would see that the people of Britain have had enough. 
Ever increasing taxation to try and fix their mistakes? 
Continuiosly using the NHS as a stick to beat the opposition or a classic party political paper dragon! (Paper Dragon): a politician or political party whocampaign to fox the proble…

PETITION - Keep Swinson OUT of the Lords

Keep Jo Swinson from being given a Peerage.
Sign the petition and share this everywhere

If Jo Swinson is given honors, it will be a scandal and ANOTHER Nail in the coffin for the House of Lords. Sign the petition


Has the Supreme Court handed Boris Johnson a Brexit escape route?

The Supreme Court’s judgment is the latest constitutional perversion after the Benn act. But ironically it may assist the Government in achieving its objective of Britain leaving the EU by 31 October, without having to seek an extension to the Article 50 process.
In paragraph 34, the Supreme Court states that its ‘proper function’ under our constitution is to give effect to the separation of powers (which justifies court intervention in relation to prorogation). Then, in what appears to be an innocuous sentence in paragraph 55, it says that it is to be “remember[ed] always that the actual task of governing is for the executive and not for Parliament or the courts.”
Yet the Benn Act manifestly contradicts this principle. It dictates how the Government must conduct negotiations with a foreign body, the EU, to the extent of obliging the Prime Minister to write specifically worded letters and accept whatever extension it offers when certain conditions are not met. In the situation when t…