Skip to main content

Theresa May set to quit in July after launching final Brexit push – but will it be enough to stop Tory coup?

THERESA May is on course to quit as PM at the end of July after announcing a last-ditch Brexit gamble.

The Prime Minister has vowed to push her deal through the Commons within two months – or it will be killed off for good.

Theresa May is set to step down at the end of July
Splash News

The move suggests she plans to leave No10 in time for a leadership election which will take place over the summer holidays.

Mrs May will explain the timetable to Tory grandees tomorrow at a meeting where she’ll try to persuade them not to greenlight a coup against her.

She will bring the crucial Withdrawal Agreement Bill to Parliament in the first week of June with a view to getting it signed off by the end of July.

The Cabinet yesterday agreed it’s essential to get Britain out of the EU in time for the Commons’ summer recess.


The PM has previously said she would stand down as soon as her Brexit deal is approved.

If the Withdrawal Agreement Bill fails, her deal will be dead – almost certainly triggering Mrs May’s resignation.

Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay said today: “If the House of Commons does not approve the WAB then the Barnier deal is dead in that form.

“The house will have to then address a much more fundamental question between whether it will pursue and communicate on a No Deal option or whether it will revoke.”

The timetable implies that Mrs May will be gone by the end of July in any case, with a new leader likely to take over at the party conference in early October.

Tomorrow the PM will be summoned to address the senior Tory MPs who run the powerful 1922 Committee.

They have threatened to trigger a new leadership challenge if she refuses to explain when she plans to leave office.

But the newly revealed timeline may be enough to convince them there’s no need to push her out earlier.

The PM has been summoned to see backbench chief Sir Graham Brady tomorrow
PA:Press Association

We pay for your stories! Do you have a story for The Sun Online politics team? Email us at or call 0207 782 4368. We pay for videos too. Click here to upload yours


  1. Kick it out AGAIN, we do not want it, WTO rules will work fine here and the EU will be chasing us for deals!

    OUT MEANS OUT, NO DEALS, that is what we voted for!

    Any MP's voting for her deal will, more than likely, be signing their own departure/dole documents!

  2. I'd sack them all now for dereliction of duty - we don't need their opinions or votes, they are no longer required. Just tell the EU we're out - NO DEAL


Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politicians are wrong about what the public want

So the, out of touch political elite are trying to say that the public would be happy to cough up an extra £2000 a year, per household to prop up the NHS? 
Advertisers website Wrong! While many British families struggle to make ends meet, the political elite thinks that people will be glad to fund a failing business that is being run into the ground because of their failed policies on how the NHS is managed?

No. This just shows that we have monkeys running our country! Many people on Facebook have shared the above post on various pages; a large number of those people don't even do politics. If our political elite were more than just yes men weighed down by the chains of political correctness, they would see that the people of Britain have had enough. 
Ever increasing taxation to try and fix their mistakes? 
Continuiosly using the NHS as a stick to beat the opposition or a classic party political paper dragon! (Paper Dragon): a politician or political party whocampaign to fox the proble…

PETITION - Keep Swinson OUT of the Lords

Keep Jo Swinson from being given a Peerage.
Sign the petition and share this everywhere

If Jo Swinson is given honors, it will be a scandal and ANOTHER Nail in the coffin for the House of Lords. Sign the petition


Has the Supreme Court handed Boris Johnson a Brexit escape route?

The Supreme Court’s judgment is the latest constitutional perversion after the Benn act. But ironically it may assist the Government in achieving its objective of Britain leaving the EU by 31 October, without having to seek an extension to the Article 50 process.
In paragraph 34, the Supreme Court states that its ‘proper function’ under our constitution is to give effect to the separation of powers (which justifies court intervention in relation to prorogation). Then, in what appears to be an innocuous sentence in paragraph 55, it says that it is to be “remember[ed] always that the actual task of governing is for the executive and not for Parliament or the courts.”
Yet the Benn Act manifestly contradicts this principle. It dictates how the Government must conduct negotiations with a foreign body, the EU, to the extent of obliging the Prime Minister to write specifically worded letters and accept whatever extension it offers when certain conditions are not met. In the situation when t…