Skip to main content

Smug LBC caller revels with delight - It takes Nigel to shut him down

Smug Liberal clearly doesn't understand the meaning of the word democracy.

'I've got the judgement!' – Farage shuts down LBC guest slammi...
'I've got the judgement!' – Farage shuts down LBC guest slamming his Supreme Court views NIGEL FARAGE brilliantly shut down an enraged caller who called into question the Brexiteer’s views on the Supreme Court ruling, accusing him of presenting a “flimsy” argument. By JOE BARNES Published : 21:59, Tue, Jan 24, 2017 The outspoken commentator quickly turned the tables on his guest after the caller claimed that Mr Farage had shown he that he doesn’t “understand” why the ruling had gone the way it did. The Supreme Court rules that parliament must now vote on whether the Government can start the Brexit process by triggering Article 50. The judgement means Theresa May cannot begin talks with theEuropean Union until MPs and peers give their backing – although this is expected to happen in time for the Prime Minister’s March 31 deadline. Discussing the ruling on his LBC show, Mr Farage said that the ruling is part of an establishment effort to overturn the will of the British people and their historic vote for Brexit on June 23. Nigel Farage “A group of wealthy business people, many MPs in the House of Commons, many people in the House of Lords, sections of the media are trying to do everything they can to delay and dilute the whole Brexit process,” he blasted. The former Ukip leader then welcomed a caller, known only as Chris, from Temple, London, who said it had been a “fantastic day for democracy”, having heard the news from the Supreme Court. Chris then went on to accuse Mr Farage of ignoring one of the “most respected judiciaries in the world”. He then called into question the former Ukip leader's “legal argument", suggesting it was "wrong”, to which Mr Farage replied: “I think Chris, we can agree that perhaps legally it is very difficult to say what is right and what is “That’s why we are here in the first place that really concerns me, the fact that a group of very wealthy people – who are doing very nicely – have done all they can to get us to this position today and we will now see an attempt in parliament to delay and dilute the process.” But his guest attempting to rebuke the host, blasted: “The point that I am making is that you’ve given an extremely flimsy legal overview of what the problem is. “You don’t understand…” Mr Farage, brilliantly shutting down his guest, swiftly interjected: “I fully accept that it is legally contentious, but I’m asking why we are here in the first place. “I’ve got the judgement, and let me tell you this question about the independence of the judiciary – I did feel very strongly that one of the judges in the lower court, Lord Thomas, had been a career activist promoting political union of our legal systems. “I don’t think he should have made that judgement, and it’s even questionable perhaps one of the judges sitting today, Lady Hale had pre-judged the whole thing some months ago shouldn’t have been there. “There are questions about whether our judiciaries are as independent as it used to be, but I’m not expecting to get into long legal arguments. “To me, I will agree with you on one thing, that it would have been much better had the legislation had been framed that it was a binding referendum and I would suggest any future national referendum it has to be legally binding.”
Posted by The Rise of UKIP on Tuesday, 24 January 2017

Comments

Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politicians are wrong about what the public want

So the, out of touch political elite are trying to say that the public would be happy to cough up an extra £2000 a year, per household to prop up the NHS? 
Advertisers website Wrong! While many British families struggle to make ends meet, the political elite thinks that people will be glad to fund a failing business that is being run into the ground because of their failed policies on how the NHS is managed?

No. This just shows that we have monkeys running our country! Many people on Facebook have shared the above post on various pages; a large number of those people don't even do politics. If our political elite were more than just yes men weighed down by the chains of political correctness, they would see that the people of Britain have had enough. 
Ever increasing taxation to try and fix their mistakes? 
Continuiosly using the NHS as a stick to beat the opposition or a classic party political paper dragon! (Paper Dragon): a politician or political party whocampaign to fox the proble…

PETITION - Keep Swinson OUT of the Lords

Keep Jo Swinson from being given a Peerage.
Sign the petition and share this everywhere

If Jo Swinson is given honors, it will be a scandal and ANOTHER Nail in the coffin for the House of Lords. Sign the petition

CLICK HERE TO SIGN

Has the Supreme Court handed Boris Johnson a Brexit escape route?

The Supreme Court’s judgment is the latest constitutional perversion after the Benn act. But ironically it may assist the Government in achieving its objective of Britain leaving the EU by 31 October, without having to seek an extension to the Article 50 process.
In paragraph 34, the Supreme Court states that its ‘proper function’ under our constitution is to give effect to the separation of powers (which justifies court intervention in relation to prorogation). Then, in what appears to be an innocuous sentence in paragraph 55, it says that it is to be “remember[ed] always that the actual task of governing is for the executive and not for Parliament or the courts.”
Yet the Benn Act manifestly contradicts this principle. It dictates how the Government must conduct negotiations with a foreign body, the EU, to the extent of obliging the Prime Minister to write specifically worded letters and accept whatever extension it offers when certain conditions are not met. In the situation when t…